Feeds:
文章
留言

Archive for 2007 年 09 月

那麼我也來為部落格的文章寫一篇「序」,雖然好像慢了點!

如秉翰提到的,我們是中華民國憲法偏離自由民主主義的犧牲品—兩個不願意的義務役士兵!相信社會上大多數的義務役現役軍人都與我們有相同的感受,但是有趣 的是,當這多男性公民曾經親身經歷「人民有依法律服兵役之義務」(中華民國憲法第20條)所造成的傷害,(如:民進黨總統候選人謝長廷就曾指出,他赴日深造時,已比同學們大三歲!)卻放任這條沒道理的法條繼續荼毒台灣年輕的一代,甚至為徵兵制背書! (繼續閱讀…)

廣告

Read Full Post »

Watching the passionate politics in the streets and vibrant economy that survived the 97 Asian financial crises, many believe Taiwan (officially dubbed Republic of China or R.O.C.) has come a long way from its past colonial and authoritarian governments to metamorphose into a democracy. As a Taiwanese resident, I can testify to this view. However, a mature democracy has to be more than just elections and industries. It is also about respect for natural rights of human beings and a capable institution for protecting it. This is where Taiwan’s democratic maturity is less able to stand up to scrutiny. Both Ming-Sen and I believe this weakness is particularly demonstrative in Taiwan’s compulsory military service (henceforth CMS) and thus forms the general theme of this blog. (繼續閱讀…)

Read Full Post »

當服兵役是憲法層次規定之義務時,人民便無其他替代選擇(比如:選擇加入一個沒有愛國教育的部隊),那麼在軍中規劃政戰課程,強制役男接受愛國教育(部隊 似乎也有行政不中立之虞!),肯定侵犯其憲法保障之基本人權,相當於國家機器濫用人民的義務,對人民進行思想控制!為了這種集體利益的兵役義務侵犯個人思 想自由及人格尊嚴,很明顯的,是以空泛的集體主義目標合理化國家對個人基本人權之限制與壓抑!

Read Full Post »

謬誤二:男生都應該當兵,這樣子才公平!
提出這樣論點的人只看到每個役男表面上浪費時間的長短,沒有考慮到其背後所隱含成本的不同。如果從「機會成本」的角度仔細分析,每個男生都當一年二個月的兵,未必符合大眾所期待的「公平」! (繼續閱讀…)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts